Symbolic significance and cognitive dimension of the Latvian landscape
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22616/j.landarchart.2023.22.06Keywords:
landscape symbols, cognitive landscape, model of the symbolic meaning of the landscapeAbstract
As well as physical reality, the landscape is also an emotionally symbolic structure that closely intertwines with human cognitive perception, self-identification, with the perception of the homeland, as well as affects our daily habits. The landscape, as a cultural expression, forms a close connection with historical and political events, with traditions and customs, with each individual and with the nation as a whole, all of this manifests itself in a symbolic sense of the landscape, often used as a national recognition, for marketing purposes, but the symbols of the landscape are also a close connection between each individual and their native place and ancestors. The research analyses various aspects and phenomena that influence the symbolic importance of the landscape and relate to both cognitive aspects of each individual or community, nation, and collective memory and other expressions of identity and self-awareness. The landscape has a holistic nature that explains the close connection of several processes, both physical changes in landscape and changes in perception of each individual, according to the political and social situation of the country. Not least importance has the history of the development of the landscape perception of each country, which has been formed relatively recently in Latvia and art, photograms and the systematic division of the landscape created by researchers also play a big role in it. The regional context and cultural and historical division of Latvia should also be noted in the creation of landscape symbols. Cognitive processes are therefore associated with such concepts – Genius Locci, memory and event landscapes, landscape identity, place names, landscape biographies, etc. As a result, the author's model for the development and operation of the symbolic meaning of the landscape is presented, reflecting the structure and specificity of the symbolic creation of the landscape, as well as related processes that influence the symbolic meaning of the landscape.
References
Ainavu dārgumi [online 09.05.2023.] https://ainavudargumi.lv/
Ainavu politikas pamatnostādnes 2013.–2019. gadam [online 09.05.2023.] http://polsis.mk.gov.lv/documents/4427
Antrop, M., Van, Eetvelde, V. Holistic aspects of suburban landscapes: visual image interpretation and landscape metrics. In: Landscape and Urban Planning, vol.50, 2000, p.43–58.
Barnes, T. J. Placing ideas: Genius loci, heterotopia and geography's quantitative revolution. In: Human Geography, vol. 28(5), 2004, p. 565–595.
Bell, S. Social Exclusion, Rural Poverty and Landscape Change in Latvia [online 9.05.2023.] www.openspace.eca.ac.uk /conference/proceedings/PDF/Bell.pdf
Bell, S., Peneze, Z., Montarzino, A., et.al. Rural society, social inclusion and landscape change in central and eastern Europe: a case study of Latvia. In: Sociologia Ruralis, 2009, Vol. 49, No. 3, p. 295–326. ISSN 1467-9523.
Bunkše E. V. The Case of the Missing Sublime in Latvian Landscape Aesthetics and Ethics, In: Ethics, Place & Environment, vol. 4:3, (2001) 235-246,
Bunkše, E.V. Reality of rural landscape symbolism in the formation of a post-Soviet, postmodern Latvian identity. In: Journal of Geography, Vol. 53, 1999, p. 121–138. ISSN 0029-1951.
Carter, J., Dyer, P., Sharma, B. Dis-placed voices: sense of place and place identity on the Sunshine Coast. In: Scandinavian Journal of History, vol. 8, No. 5, 2007, p. 755–773. ISNN 1502-7716.
Christou P., Farmaki A., Saveriades A., Spanou E. The “genius loci” of places that experience intense tourism development. In: Tourism Management Perspectives, vol 30, 2019, 19-32 p.
Eiropas ainavu konvencija [online 09.05.2023.] https://likumi.lv/ta/lv/starptautiskie-ligumi/id/1265
Gittus, E. J. Berlin as a Conduit for the Creation of German National Identity at the End of the Twentieth Century. In: Space and Polity, 2002, Vol. 6, No. 1, p. 91–115. ISNN 1470-1235.
Hough, M. Out of Place, Restoring Identity to the Regional Landscape, New Haven. London: Yale University Press Publ., 1990, 230 p. ISBN 0-300-04510-7.
Kanaviņa, R. Latvijas ainavas identitāte. Maģistra darbs. Jelgava: LLU, 2012.
Klepers, A. Ainavu Dārgumi karte, 2021, From: https://ainavudargumi.lv/karte/
Kneafsey, M. Tourism and Place Identity: A case-study in rural Ireland. In: Irish Geography, vol. 31, No. 2, 1998, p. 111–123. ISNN 1939-4055.
Kultūrvēsturiskās ainavas rezolūcija [online 09.05.2023.] https://www.nkmp.gov.lv/lv/search?q=Kult%C5%ABrv%20%C4%93sturisk%C4%81%20ainava%20Latvij%C4%81&page=4
Laszlo, E. Introduction to Systems Philosophy: Toward a New Paradigm of Contemporary Thought. Harper Torchbook Publ., New York, 1972.
Laszlo, E. The Choice: Evolution or Extinction. A Thinking Person's Guide to Global Issues. C.P. Putnam and Sons Publ., New York, 1994.
Latvijas kultūras kanons [online 09.05.2023.] https://kulturaskanons.lv/list/
Likumprojekts “Latviešu vēsturisko zemju likums” [online 09.05.2023.] https://www.president.lv/lv/media/4761/download?attachment
Murzyn-Kupisz, M., Gwosdz, K. The changing identity of the Central European city: the case of Katowice. In: Journal of Historical Geography, vol. 37, 2011, p. 113–126.
Naveh Z., Lieberman A. Landscape ecology: theory and application. New York, Springer-Verlag, 1984.
Naveh, Z. Ten major premises for a holistic conception of multifunctional landscapes. In: Landscape and Urban Planning, vol. 57, 2001, p. 269–284.
Naveh, Z. What is holistic landscape ecology? A conceptual introduction. In: Landscape and Urban Planning, vol.50, 2000, p.7–26.
Nitavska N. Method of landscape identity assessment. In: Research for rural development, vol.2, 2011, p.175.-181
Nogue, J., Vicente J. (2004) Landscape and national identity in Catalonia. In: Political Geography, vol. 23, 2004, p.113–132
Ņitavska N. Baltijas jūras piekrastes ainavu identitāte Latvijā. Promocijas darbs. Jelgava: LLU, 2014, 216 lpp.
Palang, H., Alumäe, H., Mander, Ü. Holistic aspects in landscape development: a scenario approach. In: Landscape and Urban Planning vol.50, 2000, p.85–94.
Petzet, M. Genius Loci – The Spirit of Monuments and Sites. In: 16th ICOMOS General Assembly and International Symposium: ‘Finding the spirit of place – between the tangible and the intangible’, Quebec- Canada. 2008.
Selman P. Planning at the Landscape Scale. Routledge Publ., 2006, 213 p.
Skultans, V. Theorizing Latvian lives: The quest for identity. In: The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute. vol. 3(4), 1997, p.761–780.
Sörlin, S. The articulation of territory: landscape and the constitution of regional and national identity. In: Norwegian Journal of Geography, vol. 53, No. 2, 1999, p. 103–112. ISNN 1502-5292.
Stephens, J. K. Rock: The Formation of Place and Identity. In: Urban Policy and Research, vol. 20, No. 1,2002, p.87–99. ISNN 1476-7244.
Stephenson, J. The Cultural Values Model: An integrated approach to values in landscapes. In: Landscape and Urban Planning, vol. 84, 2010, p.127–139. ISSN 01692046.
Tress, B., Tress, G. 2001. Capitalising on multiplicity: a transdisciplinary systems approach to landscape research. In: Landscape and Urban Planning. 57, 143–157.
Weinberg, G.M. Introduction to General Systems Thinking. Wiley Publ., New York, 1975.
Zariņa A., Krumberga K. Territoriality of signs: amber in the State’s semiotics in Latvia. In: Geo Journal, vol 83, 2018, p. 101–118.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Landscape Architecture and Art
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
