Strategies for the revitalization of the watercourse landscapes: a case study of the Lielupe river

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22616/j.landarchart.2025.27.04

Keywords:

landscape planning, sustainability, river tourism, waterfronts

Abstract

River tourism is a popular type of recreation across the globe. There is a strong tradition of river tourism in Latvia, mainly boating and rafting in wildlife areas. Zemgale district, with its slowly flowing rivers and predominantly agricultural landscape, is not among the most popular boating destinations. However, the main river of Zemgale – Lielupe River has a tremendous history of river shipping traffic, which nowadays is largely neglected. Seeking a way to revive this kind of river traffic, this paper examines the river’s forces on human society to find a way of river traveling that is compatible with ecological and human comfort necessities. The territory of the Lielupe River floodplain section from Bauska to Sloka towns is characterized according to a travel perspective, considering a passage both on the river and alongside it. The sustainability of the territory is analyzed from the aspects of accessibility, attractiveness, and environmental quality. Since river travel is not imaginable without public access to the  riverbank, this paper discusses the development of public waterfronts. It proposes examples of tourist routes along the river and the development of public infrastructure for shipping and boating. The places and character of primary development are considered. The research fits in the framework of the policy of sustainable development of the Latvian countryside.

Author Biographies

Kristīne Vugule, Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies

Dr. Arch., assistant professor and leading researcher, head of the Institute of Landscape Architecture and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Forest and Environmental Sciences, Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies.

Kaspars Cērps, Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies

Mg. arch. Landscape architect.

References

1. Maslow, A. H. A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review. 1943, No. 50 (4), p. 370–396. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054346

2. Burmil, S., Daniel, T. C., Hetherington, J. D. Human values and perceptions of water in arid landscapes, Landscape and Urban Planning, 1999, Volume 44, Issues 2–3, p. 99–109.

3. Wrenn, D. Urban waterfront development. Urban Land Institute. 1983. 219 p.

4. Seabrook, L., Mcalpine, C. A., Bowen, M. E. Restore, repair or reinvent: Options for sustainable landscapes in a changing climate, Landscape and Urban Planning, 2011, Volume 100, Issue 4, p. 407–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.015.

5. Moretti, M., Giovinazzi, O. Port Cities and Urban Waterfront: Transformations and Opportunities. TeMaLab Journal of Mobility, Land Use, and Environment, 2010, Vol 3 - SP - March 2010, p. 57-64. DOI: 10.6092/1970-9870/123

6. Project for Public Spaces. 9 steps to creating a great waterfront. 2008, December 31, [online 03.04.2024] https://www.pps.org/article/stepstocreatingagreatwaterfront

7. Breen A., Rigby D. The New Waterfront: A Worldwide Urban Success Story. McGraw-Hill Professional. 1996. 224 p. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(99)00007-9 .

8. Xin, J., Jianguo, W. Assessing Linear Urban Landscape from dynamic visual perception based on urban morphology. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 2021, 10, p. 202–219.

9. Cullen, G. The Concise Townscape. Architectural Press. 1961. 196 p.

10. Seo, K. & Kim, C. Interpretable Housing for Freedom of the Body: The Next Generation of Flexible Homes. Journal of Building Construction and Planning Research, 2013, No.1, p. 75–81. doi: 10.4236/jbcpr.2013.13011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2021.01.001

11. Project for Public Spaces. 10 qualities of a great waterfront. 2009, January 1, [online 03.04.2024] https://www.pps.org/article/10-qualities-of-a-great-waterfront

12. Latvijas Vides, ģeoloģijas un meteoroloģijas centrs. Lielupes upju baseinu apgabala apsaimniekošanas plāns un plūdu riska pārvaldības plāns 2022.-2027. gadam, 2021, 392 p. https://videscentrs.lvgmc.lv/files/Udens/UBA_2022_2027/Lielupes%20UBA%20plans%202022-2027%20final.pdf

13. Project for Public Spaces. 10 qualities of a great waterfront. 2009, January 1, [online 03.04.2024] https://www.pps.org/article/10-qualities-of-a-great-waterfront

14. Zerbe, S. Restoration of Multifunctional Cultural Landscapes: Merging Tradition and Innovation for a Sustainable Future (Vol. 30) 2022. Springer Nature, p. 381-440. DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-95572-4

15. Kleitman, N. Basic rest-activity cycle—22 years later, Journal of Sleep Research & Sleep Medicine, 1982, Vol 5(4), p. 311–317 DOI: 10.1093/sleep/5.4.311

16. Jelgavas novada pašvaldība. Jelgavas novada teritorijas plānojums 2011.-2023.gadam. Ainavas, 2010, p. 75-77. https://www.jelgavasnovads.lv/lv/jelgavas-novada-teritorijasplanojums-2011-2023-gadam

Downloads

Published

04-11-2025

How to Cite

Vugule, K., & Cērps, K. (2025). Strategies for the revitalization of the watercourse landscapes: a case study of the Lielupe river. Landscape Architecture and Art, 27(27), 31–37. https://doi.org/10.22616/j.landarchart.2025.27.04