Comparison of garden pavilions’ site selection in China and Italy

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22616/j.landarchart.2025.27.08

Keywords:

Chinese gardens, Italian garden, garden architecture, pavilions, site selection

Abstract

This study examines Chinese and Italian garden pavilions through a comparative approach, systematically exploring the similarities and differences in their site selection and the underlying  cultural motivations. Chinese garden pavilions are profoundly shaped by the philosophy of “the unity  of man and nature,” emphasising harmony with natural landscapes and adaptable layouts. Techniques  such as situating pavilions by mountains and water bodies are employed to achieve an organic integration of architecture and environment. In contrast, Italian pavilions embody geometric order and rational aesthetics, characterised by axial symmetry and the deliberate terrain modification to shape structured spatial sequences. Through an analysis of philosophical concepts, locational characteristics, and spatial organisation, the research reveals both the commonalities and differences  in the siting of pavilions on elevated grounds, by water, on flat terrain, and in compositional groupings,  while providing an in-depth examination of their relationships with topography, water  features, vegetation, and other architectural structures.

Author Biographies

Ning Liu, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture

PhD student in Architecture at the School of Architecture and Urban Planning of the Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture (Beijing, China). Her research focuses on Landscape Architecture History and Theory, and Heritage Conservation.

Luca Maria Francesco Fabris, Politecnico di Milano, Italy

Architect PhD, is Professor in Technological and Environmental Design of Architecture at the Department of Architecture and Urban Studies of the Politecnico di Milano (Italy) and Visiting Professor at the School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture (Beijing, China). He is a twenty-year experienced leading researcher and a scientific writer on sustainability practices in architecture and landscape.

Fan Fu, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, China

PhD and Professor in Landscape Architecture. He focuses on Landscape Architecture History and Theory, Landscape Architecture Ecology, Landscape Architecture Engineering and Technology. Currently he is teaching at the School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and  Architecture (Beijing, China).

Jingyao Wang, Guangdong Technology College, China

Lecturer at the School of Construction, Guangdong Technology College (Zhaoqing, China).

References

1. Cao, Y., Dong, C. Structural analysis of four-column pavilions from the 10th to 14th centuries. Landscape Architecture, 2018, 25(06), p. 113–117.

2. Fekete, A., Gyori, P. Chinese pavilions in the early landscape gardens of Europe. Landscape Architecture and Art, 2021, 18, p. 78–87.

3. Gao, R., Geng, X., Zhang, J. A study on the spatial composition of pavilions, terrain, and water in the Mountain Resort of Chengde, China. Papers of the 24th Environmental Information Science Conference. Vol. 24. Tokyo: Centre for Environmental Information Science, 2010, p. 291–296.

4. Gu, K. The significance of architecture in traditional Chinese gardens. Proceedings of the International Conference on East Asian Architectural Culture. Kyoto, 2006, pp. 123–132.

5. Gu, K. Re-understanding the pavilion on the mountain peak in traditional Chinese gardens: Function, culture and concept evolution. Chinese Landscape Architecture, 2016, 32(07), p. 78–83.

6. Göker, P., Erdoğan, E. Garden design principles and the extensive use of water elements in Villa d’Este, Tivoli, Italy. Online Journal of Art & Design, 2020, 8(4), p. 188–204.

7. Huang, X., Ge, Y., Zhou, H. The balance of the regular and the strange in the Ming Dynasty garden architecture layout: A case study of Yuanye and Zhiyuan Garden. New Architecture, 2020 No. 1, p. 19–24.

8. Ivashko, Y., Kuśnierz-Krupa, D., Chang, P. History of origin and development, compositional and morphological features of park pavilions in ancient China. Landscape Architecture, 2020, 15(15), p.78–85.

9. Ji, C. Yuanzhi annotated. 2nd ed. Edited by Z. Chen. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 1988.

10. Li, C. Lasting fragrance of pavilions: An overview of the cultural dissemination of classical Chinese gardens abroad. Chinese Landscape Architecture, 2020, 36(10), p. 133–138.

11. Li, M., Chau, H. W., Jamei, E., Pourakbar, H. Nature’s poetry unveiled: Exploring the symbolism and design philosophy of Chinese and Persian gardens through metaphor and art. Landscape Architecture and Art, 2023, 22(22), p. 157–165.

12. Liu, B., Zhao, Y. A study on the “profound-secluded” theory in pavilion-centred scenery composition. Chinese Landscape Architecture, 2019, 35(07), p. 17–23.

13. Liu, J., Chen, L. Cultural translation of China in 18th-century European garden buildings: A case study of the Chinese Pavilion in Drottningholm Palace, Sweden. Huazhong Architecture, 2024, 42(06), p. 17–20.

14. Ma, J. Preliminary study on the method of pavilion placement in mountain landscapes. Chinese Landscape Architecture, 1996, No.1, p. 47–55.

15. Milic, B. Italian Mannerist and early Baroque Garden. Prostor, 2007, 15(1), p. 97–109.

16. Rinaldi, B. M. The Jesuit contribution to Oriental influence on European gardens. XXVII International Horticultural Congress—IHC2006: Global Horticulture: Diversity and Harmony, an Introduction to IHC2006. Vol. 759. 2006, p. 153–165.

17. Zhang, Y. A study on the pavilion. Chinese Landscape Architecture, 2002, No. 3, p.81–84.

18. Zhao, J., Cao, L. Methods of constructing artistic conception in Chinese garden architecture: Case studies. Chinese Landscape Architecture, 2024, 40(08), p. 30–36.

Downloads

Published

04-11-2025

How to Cite

Liu, N., Fabris, L. M. F., Fu, F., & Wang, J. (2025). Comparison of garden pavilions’ site selection in China and Italy. Landscape Architecture and Art, 27(27), 61–68. https://doi.org/10.22616/j.landarchart.2025.27.08