Evaluating social interaction performance and sense of community in urban green space: the case of Trabzon Ganita coast
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22616/j.landarchart.2024.24.03Keywords:
social interaction performance, place experience, performance evaluation, sense of communityAbstract
As population increases in urban centers, urban open spaces are gradually diminishing and the quality of existing spaces is deteriorating. Therefore, when designing open spaces in cities facing issues such as population growth, unplanned urbanization, industrialization, and transportation problems, social dimensions should be considered as much as ecological and economic dimensions. This study focuses on the Ganita Coastal Project, one of the identity spaces of the city of Trabzon. The aim is to determine the social performance of urban open space organizations formed after the implementation of the project and to reveal their effects on the sense of community. The research method consists of surveys that include the evaluation of the social interaction performance provided by the place and the assessment of the sense of community. The research results show that the social interaction performance of the place has a positive and significant relationship with the sense of community. This study defines the sub-dimensions of social features by focusing solely on the social characteristics of the place. The social factors affecting the sense of community are identified as the functional, social, and perceptual sub-dimensions, respectively. The success of the social features such as popularity of place, social accessibility, and variety of activities has allowed for the intense use
of this space. This research focuses on the social interaction performance but cannot claim to have examined all the features of the place that constitute social interaction. Considering the importance of urban open spaces as a social stage and their significance in forming relationships between people and places as well as among people themselves, the findings of this study are quite important. The results, especially regarding which social features of a place should be taken into account when designing new urban spaces, can be guiding for both designers and managers.
References
Chen, N. C., Dwyer, L., & Firth, T. Residents’ place attachment and word-of-mouth behaviours: A tale of two cities. Journal of
Hospitality and Tourism Management, 2018, No36, p.1-11.
Cresswell, T. Defining place. Place: A Short Introduction. Malden, MA: Blackwell Ltd, 2004.
Pretty, G.H., Chipuer, H.M. and Bramston, P. “Sense of place amongst adolescents and adults in two rural Australian towns: the discriminating features of place attachment, sense of community and place dependence in relation to place identity”, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2003, Vol. 23 No. 3, p. 273-287.
Gehl, J. Life, Spaces, Buildings–And in Said Order, Please. In Urban design futures, 2006, p. 88-93, Routledge.
CABE, D. C. The value of urban design, 2001.
Swanwick, C., Dunnett, N., & Woolley, H. Nature, role and value of green space in towns and cities: An overview. Built Environment (1978-), 2003, p.94-106.
Özkan, D. G., & Yilmaz, S. The effects of physical and social attributes of place on place attachment: A case study on Trabzon urban squares. Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research, 2019, 13(1), 133-150.
Canter, D. The Psychology of Place, Architectural Press, London, 1977.
Project for Public Spaces (Ed.) How To Turn A Place Around: A Handbook For Creating Successful Public Spaces, Project For Public Spaces, New York, NY, 2000.
Gehl, J. Cities for people. Island press, 2013.
Salama, A. M. Plurality and diversity in architectural and urban research. Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research, 2017, 11(2), 1-5.
Whyte, W.The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces. Washington, D.C.: Conservation Foundation, 1980.
Carmona, M. Contemporary public space, part two: Classification. Journal of urban design, 2010, 15(2), 157-173.
Carr, S., Francis, M., Rivlin, L.G. and Stone, A.M. Public Space, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1992.
Bilge, F. U. A Comparison of the Qualifications of Urban Public Open Spaces and the Evaluation of their Activities: A Pilot Study in Ankara, Turkey. Online Journal of Art & Design, 2023, 11(4).
Fornara, F., Bonaiuto, M., & Bonnes, M. Cross-validation of abbreviated perceived residential environment quality (PREQ) and neighborhood attachment (NA) indicators. Environment and Behavior, 2010, 42(2), 171-196.
Khaleghımoghaddam, N., Arzhangı, S., & Rajaeıpour, N. Investigating the Contribution of Socio-Physical Structure of Neighborhoods on Residents’ Sense of Attachment. PLANARCH-Design and Planning Research, 2023, 7(2), 191-202.
Carmona, M. Public places urban spaces: The dimensions of urban design. Routledge, 2021.
Jacobs, J. M. The city unbound: qualitative approaches to the city. Urban Studies, 1993, 30(4-5), 827-848.
Montgomery, J. Making a city: Urbanity, vitality and urban design. Journal of urban design,1998, 3(1), 93-116.
Mehta, V., & Bosson, J. K. Third places and the social life of streets. Environment and behavior, 2010, 42(6), 779-805.
Wickes R., Zahnow R., Corcoran J. & Hipp J. R. Neighbourhood social conduits and resident social cohesion, Urban Studies, 2019, 56, 1, 226-248.
Brown, B., Perkins, D. D., & Brown, G. Place attachment in a revitalizing neighborhood: Individual and block levels of analysis. Journal of environmental psychology, 2003, 23(3), 259-271.
McMillan, D. W., & Chavis, D. M. Sense of community: A definition and theory. Journal of Community Psychology, 1986, 14(1), 6–23.
Talen, E. Measuring the public realm: A preliminary assessment of the link between public space and sense of community. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 2000, 17, 344e360.
Francis, M. Urban open space: Designing for user needs. Island Press, 2003.
Gehl, J. Life, Spaces, Buildings–And in Said Order, Please. In Urban design futures (pp. 88-93). Routledge, 2006.
Jacobs, A. B. Great streets (No. qt3t62h1fv). University of California Transportation Center, 1993.
Lynch, K. The image of the environment. The image of the city, 1960, 11, 1-13.
Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu. Temel İstatistikler/Nüfus ve Demografi/Nüfus İstatistikleri/Yıllara Göre İl Nüfusları, Retrieved from: http://www.tuik.gov.tr/UstMenu.do?metod=temelist , 2023.
Long, D. A., & Perkins, D. D. Confirmatory factor analysis of the sense of community index and development of a brief SCI. Journal of community psychology, 2003, 31(3), 279-296.
Karaçor, E. K., & Akçam, E. Explanation of conceptual relationship between variables of place identity, sense of community and environmental attitude by structural equation modelling. Turkish Journal of Forestry,2016, 17(2), 194-200.
Özkan, D. G., Özkan, S. D., & Akyol, D. Place satısfactıon, place attachment and sense of communıty ın neıghborhoods: a case study on Trabzon, TURKEY. Management Research & Practice, 2019, 11(3).
Rafieyan, M., & Sifaei, M. Urban public spaces; quality evaluation & review. Tehran: Fine Arts Science-Research Periodical, 2005, 23, 35-42.
Madanipour, A. Social exclusion and space. In The city reader (pp. 237-245). Routledge, 2015.
Ujang, N., Kozlowski, M., & Maulan, S. Linking place attachment and social interaction: towards meaningful public places. Journal of Place Management and Development, 2018, 11(1), 115-129.
Oktay, D. Influences of urban design on perceived social attributes and quality of life: a comparative study in two English neighbourhoods. URBAN DESIGN International, 2023, 28(4), 304-319.
Perkins, D. D., Florin, P., Rich, R. C., Wandersman, A., & Chavis, D. M. Participation and the social and physical environment of residential blocks: Crime and community context. American journal of community psychology, 1990, 18, 83-115.
Jorgensen BS, Stedman RC. Sense of place as an attitude: Lakeshore owners attitudes toward their properties. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2001, 21(1): 233-248.
Lewicka, M. Place attachment: How far have we come in the last 40 years?. Journal of environmental psychology, 2011, 31(3), 207-230.
Lu, J., Zhou, S., Zheng, Z., Liu, L., & Kwan, M. P. Examining the relationship between social context and community attachment through the daily social context averaging effect. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 2023, 1-21.
Salama, A. M., & Azzali, S. Examining attributes of urban open spaces in Doha. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Urban Design and Planning, 2015, 168(2), 75-87.
Lefebvre, H. The production of space. In The people, place, and space reader (pp. 289-293). Routledge, 2014.
Karakaş, M. Kent, mekân ve toplum: Mekân sosyolojisine giriş. Kent, mekân ve toplum, 2019, 15-40.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Landscape Architecture and Art
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
