Sound studies of the architectural environment: urban soundscape and sound semantics

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22616/j.landarchart.2025.27.02

Keywords:

architectural environment, soundscape, sound design, sound semantics, sound signal

Abstract

The article is dedicated to a new field for Ukraine – the acoustic study of the architectural environment,  the semantics of sound, and the impact of sound signals on human behavior in urban spaces. The concept of the soundscape, introduced into scientific discourse in the 1970s by R. Murray Schafer and his followers, is explored. They laid the foundation for and initiated acoustic studies of cities in the context of their auditory pollution. The methodology for studying the urban soundscape developed by them became the basis for contemporary practical work and was tested by students of the National Academy of Fine Arts and Architecture (Kyiv, Ukraine). Their task involved recording changes in the soundscape according to different types of urban spaces and observing human behavior under the influence of sound signals. All research results were visualized on graphic sound maps. The role of sound in perceiving the architectural space of a city is defined in comparison to the significance of sound in cinema. It is noted that, as in cinema, sound in the urban architectural environment has its own functions: illustration; contrast or counterpoint to the visual sequence; communication; synchronization; structuralization. As in films, sounds can emphasize events (e.g., the sound of a theatrical celebration in a city square), maintain tension in transitional spaces (e.g., the sound of a traffic light), warn of danger, obstacles, or threats (e.g., the sound of a siren), act as a dominant element indicating direction (e.g., a clock on a town hall), convey the novelty of a space or its mystery (e.g., unclear, atypical sounds for a given soundscape), and so on. Based on this, it is hypothesized that the architectural environment can be modeled by programming impressions of its perception and influencing people’s behavior within it. Sound is one of the most  powerful tools for shaping the perception of architectural space, and sound compositions become an essential  component of the sound environment of a modern city, requiring further research and the development of principles  for urban sound design. The authors note that the study of the semantics of sound in general and sound signals in particular, as well as their influence on human behavior, is not yet complete but holds great promise for further development of such research on the architectural environment of cities, particularly in Ukraine.

Author Biographies

Olena Troshkina, National Academy of Fine Arts and Architecture

Associate prof. Ph.D, Department of Architecture of the National Academy of Fine Arts and Architecture. Sphere of interests – landscape architecture, semantics of architecture, architectural space, scenario approaches to architectural space design.

Arsenii Troshkin, “State University “Kyiv Aviation Institute”.

Senior Lecturer, PhD., Department of of Computer Design and Graphics Technologies, “State University “Kyiv Aviation Institute”. Sphere of interest ‒ urban environment, residential zones, functional-planning structure, urban territory design, public service establishments, food establishments, restaurants, and  catering establishments.

Liliia Gnatiuk, “State University “Kyiv Aviation Institute”

Associate Professor, Candidate of Architecture (PhD in architecture), Associate Professor at the Department of Computer Design and Graphics Technologies, “State University “Kyiv Aviation Institute”. Sphere of interest ‒ formation of the sacred space, functional-planning structure sacred architecture, tradition, late modernism, neomodernism, symbol, art.

Liudmyla Shevchenko, National University “Yuri Kondratyuk Poltava Polytechnic”

Associate prof. Ph.D, Department of Buildings Architecture and Design National University “Yuri Kondratyuk Poltava Polytechnic”. Sphere of interests – heritage architecture and landscape, modern landscape design, urban design.

Natalia Novoselchuk, National University “Yuri Kondratyuk Poltava Polytechnic”.

Associate prof. Ph.D, Department of Buildings Architecture and Design National University “Yuri Kondratyuk Poltava Polytechnic”. Polytechnic”. Sphere of interests – landscape and urbandesign, interior design,  heritage architecture.

References

1. Байтеряков, О. З. Структурно-логічна модель формування міського звукового ландшафту. Часопис картографії, 2016, No. 16, p. 86–99. Available at: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/ktvsh_2016_16_10

2. Канський, В., Канська, В. Звуковий ландшафт: поняття та підходи до класифікації. Наукові записки Вінницького державного педагогічного університету імені Михайла Коцюбинського, 2016, No. 28(3–4), p. 11–17.

3. Комаров, К. Принципи архітектурної організації внутрішніх транзитних просторів з урахуванням особливостей незорового сприйняття. Thesis (Ph.D.). Київ: Національна академія образотворчого мистецтва і архітектури, 2013. 210 p. Кондратов, А. М. Звуки и знаки. 2-е изд., перераб. Москва: Знание, 1978. 208 p.

4. Кононенко, О. Ю., Гнатюк, О. М. Міські вернакулярні райони: методика виділення на основі аналізу ментальних карт. Scientific Bulletin of Kherson State University. Series Geographical Sciences, 2023, No. 17, p. 36–49. DOI: 10.32999/ksu2413-7391/2022-17-3.

5. Лотман, Ю. М. Язык кино и проблемы киносемиотики. Киноведческие записки, 1988, No. 2, p. 131–150.

6. Трошкіна, О. Проєкції жанрів кінематографу на архітектурне середовище. Проблеми розвитку міського середовища, 2020, No. 2(25), p. 226–241.

7. Трошкіна, О. Сюжетна структура кінофільму та архітектурного середовища. Проблеми розвитку міського середовища, 2020, No. 1(24), p. 136–152.

8. Alamir, M. A., Hansen, K. The effect of type and level of background noise on food liking: A laboratory non-focused listening test. Applied Acoustics, 2021, Vol. 172, Article 107600. DOI: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2020.107600.

9. Corbin, A. Village bells: Sound and meaning in the 19th-century French countryside. New York: Columbia University Press, 1998.

10. Elliott, R. Brandon LaBelle, Acoustic territories: Sound culture and everyday life. London: Continuum, 2010. [online]. Available at: https://www.academia.edu/2163257/Brandon_LaBelle_Acoustic_Territories_Sound_Culture_and_Everyday_Life_Continuum_2010_ [Accessed 12.12.2023].

11. Hall, E. T. The hidden dimension. Garden City; New York: Doubleday, 1966. [online]. Available at: https://www.academia.edu/43785083/The_Hidden_Dimension_Edward_Hall

12. Kharchenko, P. Principles of functional classification of music in cinema. Artistic Culture. Topical Issues, 2020, No. 16, p. 179–188. DOI: 10.31500/1992-5514.16.2020.205257.

13. Kharchenko, P. Music in cinema and problems of synthesis of arts. Contemporary Art, 2021, No. 17, p. 243–255. DOI: 10.31500/2309-8813.17.2021.248469.

14. Kharchenko, P. The musical and the visual in cinema: Autonomy and synthesis. Artistic Culture. Topical Issues, 2021, No. 17(2). DOI: 10.31500/1992-5514.17(2).2021.247984.

15. Lynch, K. The image of the city. Cambridge (MA): The MIT Press, 1960. Available at: https://www.miguelangelmartinez.net/IMG/pdf/1960_Kevin_Lynch_The_Image_of_The_City_book.pdf

16. Methadone, M. Brian Eno – Ambient 1: Music for Airports [online]. YouTube, 30.09.2016. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vNwYtllyt3Q [Accessed 12.12.2023].

17. Troshkina, O., Us, V., Shevchenko, L., Novoselchuk, N., Mostovenko, A. Cinematic methods of scenario construction in the design of landscape parks. Landscape Architecture and Art, 2022, Vol. 20, No. 20, p. 82–91. DOI: 10.22616/j.landarchart.2022.20.09.

18. Oliynyk, O., Troshkina, O. Analysis of architectural urban spaces based on space syntax and scenario methods. Spatium, 2023, No. 00, p. 10. DOI: 10.2298/spat230407010o.

19. Pellegrino, R., Luckett, C. R., Shinn, S. E., Mayfield, S., Gude, K., Rhea, A., Seo, H.-S. Effects of background sound on consumers’ sensory discriminatory ability among foods. Food Quality and Preference, 2015, Vol. 43, p. 71–78. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.02.014.

20. Peng-Li, D., Mathiesen, S. L., Chan, R. C. K., Byrne, D. V., Wang, Q. J. Sounds healthy: Modelling sound-evoked consumer food choice through visual attention. Appetite, 2021, Vol. 164, Article 105264. DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105264.

21. Schafer, R. M. The soundscape: Our sonic environment and the tuning of the world. Rochester: Destiny Books, 1994. 301 p.

22. Spence, C. The perfect meal. Talks at Google [online]. 25.09.2015. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JgUVjKsP_wc

23. Toop, D. Haunted weather: Music, silence, and memory. London: Serpent’s Tail, 2004.

24. Toop, D. Ocean of sound. London: Profile Books, 2018.

25. Troshkina, O. Semiotic analysis of the architectural environment based on the method of building a film screen. Ukrainian Academy of Arts, 2023, No. 34, p. 53–61. DOI: 10.32782/2411-3034-2023-34-7.

26. Truax, B. Acoustic communication. The Soundscape Newsletter, 1993, No. 5, p. 1–5.

Downloads

Published

04-11-2025

How to Cite

Troshkina, O., Troshkin, A., Gnatiuk, L., Shevchenko, L., & Novoselchuk, N. (2025). Sound studies of the architectural environment: urban soundscape and sound semantics. Landscape Architecture and Art, 27(27), 18–24. https://doi.org/10.22616/j.landarchart.2025.27.02