Determination of levels of visual perception of the main types of forms of art objects
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22616/j.landarchart.2024.25.12Keywords:
Art object, Levels of visual perception, Types of forms of art objects, DesignAbstract
This article is a study of the main forms of art objects in the interior, where a system of levels of their visual perception is proposed for the first time. Such a system represents an effective way of solving practical issues, when at the first stage of design, the artist and designer solve the problems of the place of installation of this or that art object from the point of view of determining the necessary zone of its perception depending on the type of form. The main key emphasis in the research was made on the analysis of contemplation and perception of art objects of certain forms from different perspectives. 3D modeling of conventional art objects in virtual space was used as an experimental tool. The results of various experiments with three main types of forms were presented in the form of graphic drawings, diagrams with angular dimensions of perception zones, which reflect the content and structure of the studied problems. The method of systematization and generalization of the results made it possible to formulate the necessary levels of visual perception of the main forms of art objects in the interior, which consist of: First maximum level; Second intermediate level; The third minimum level. To test the reliability, the obtained research results were checked by student design practice. The research results were applied in real architectural projects, which made it possible to evaluate their effectiveness and practical value. The effectiveness of the formulated levels of visual perception of the main types of forms of art objects in the interior space was clearly demonstrated by the results of practical implementation. The results of the research can improve the theoretical basis in the design methodology and be recommended for implementation in the educational process, as well as for practical use in the development of art objects in various types of interiors. The proposed system of levels of visual perception can allow to expand the designer’s toolkit and will contribute to the optimization of design solutions in the context of modern trends in the design of the object-spatial environment.
References
1. Alberti, L. B. (1966). On painting. London: Yale University Press. 141 p.
2. Arnheim, R. (1974). Art and visual perception. Los Angeles: University of California Press. 508 p.
3. Baldwin, J., Burleigh, A., & Pepperell, R. (2014). Comparing artistic and geometrical perspective depictions of space in the visual field. i-Perception, 5, 536–547. https://doi.org/10.1068/i0668
4. Ching, F. D. K. (2007). Architecture: Form, Space, & Order. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons. 431 р.
5. Ciftcioglu, O., & Bittermann, M. S. (2013). Fusion of perceptions in architectural design. In Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Education and Research in Computer Aided Architectural Design in Europe (eCAADe 2013) (Vol. 2, pp. 335–343). Delft, The Netherlands: Delft University of Technology.
6. Cutting, J. E. (1987). Perception with an eye for motion. Cambridge: MIT Press. 376 p.
7. Dodsworth, S., & Anderson, S. (2015). The Fundamentals of Interior Design (2nd ed.). London: Fairchild Books, Bloomsbury. 208 p.
8. Estrada-Gonzalez, V., East, S., Garbutt, M., & Spehar, B. (2020). Viewing art in different contexts. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00569
9. Gibson, J. J. (1950). The perception of the visual world. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. 235 р.
10. Heidegger, M. (2009). El arte y el espacio. Barcelona: Herder. 48 p.
11. Helmholtz, H. von. (1867). Handbuch der physiologischen Optik. Leipzig: Leopold Voss. 874 р.
12. Hibbard, P. B., Hornsey, R. L., & Asher, J. M. (2023). Binocular information improves the reliability and consistency of pictorial relief. Vision, 7, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/vision7010001
13. Hildebrand, A. von. (1908). Das Problem der Form in der Bildenden Kunst. Strassburg: Heitz & Mündel. 164 р.
14. Itten, J. (1975). Design and form: The basic course at the Bauhaus. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold. 135 p.
15. Koenderink, J. J., Van Doorn, A. J., & Todd, J. T. (2009). Wide distribution of external local sign in the normal population. Psychological Research, 73, 14–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-008-0145-7
16. Koenderink, J., Van Doorn, A., & Wagemans, J. (2018). Magic Circle. i-Perception, 9(3), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669518770691
17. Koenderink, J. A., & Van Doorn, J. W. (2024). Varieties of pictorial vision. i-Perception, 15(5), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/20416695241267371
18. Marković, S. (2012). Components of aesthetic experience: Aesthetic fascination, aesthetic appraisal, and aesthetic emotion. i-Perception, 3, 1–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/i0450aap
19. Marcos, C. L., Domingo-Gresa, J., & Spallone, R. (2024). La ideación de la forma en el espacio: Estrategias de conformación espacial en escultura y arquitectura. Arte, Individuo y Sociedad, 36(2), 415–432. https://doi.org/10.5209/aris.91696
20. Meng, P., & Cai, P. (2014). To explore the principle of visual perception and its expression in the exhibition building dynamic space. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Advances in Social Science, Humanities, and Management (ASSHM 2014) (pp. 264–267). https://doi.org/10.2991/asshm-14.2014.73
21. Moles, A. (1981). Teoria dos objetos. Rio de Janeiro: Tempo Brasileiro. 190 р.
22. Okeke, F. O., Onoh, S. C., & Obi, N. (2019). Architecture of interior: The role and human perception of art and artifact. International Journal of Engineering & Scientific Research, 7(2), 31–46.
23. Oliva, A., Park, S., & Konkle, T. (2011). Representing, perceiving, and remembering the shape of visual space. In L. R. Harris & M. Jenkin (Eds.), Vision in 3D environments (pp. 308–340). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511736261.014
24. Posta, B., & Tuncel, D. (2023). Reading the transformation of interior space perception through technology. Art, Humanities, Design and Planning, 11(1), 33–46.
25. Pylypchuk, O., & Polubok, A. (2022). The color of the surface of the art object as a means of harmonizing the modern architectural environment. Landscape Architecture and Art, 21(21), 59–67. https://doi.org/10.22616/j.landarchart.2022.21.06
26. Pylypchuk, O. (2024). The impact of structural analysis of works of fine art on enhancing the creativity of artists and interior designers. Arte, Individuo y Sociedad, 36(4), 897–910. https://doi.org/10.5209/aris.95402
27. Polubok, A., & Pylypchuk, O. (2023). Orientation of monumental decorative sculpture in urban space. Landscape Architecture and Art, 23(23), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.22616/j.landarchart.2023.23.07
28. Robles, K. E., Bies, A. J., Lazarides, S., & Sereno, M. E. (2022). The relationship between shape perception accuracy and drawing ability. Scientific Reports, 12, Article 14900, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-18858-6
29. Smeets, J. B. J., Weijs, P. E., & Brenner, E. (2022). Familiarity with an object’s size influences the perceived size of its image. Vision, 6(1), Article 14, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/vision6010014
30. Trawiński, T., Mestry, N., & Donnelly, N. (2023). The effect of prior viewing position and spatial scale on the viewing of paintings. Vision, 7(3), Article 55, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/vision7030055
31. Van Doorn, A., Koenderink, J., & Wagemans, J. (2013). Exocentric pointing in the visual field. i-Perception, 4, 532–542. https://doi.org/10.1068/i0609
32. Wnuczko, M., & Kennedy, J. M. (2021). Foreshortening increases apparent angles. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 83, 2574–2582. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-021-02299-w
33. Xu, Z.-X., Chen, Y., & Kuai, S.-G. (2018). The human visual system estimates angle features in an internal reference frame: A computational and psychophysical study. Journal of Vision, 18(13), Article 10, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1167/18.13.10
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Landscape Architecture and Art
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
