Energy community development model for multi-apartment residential buildings in Latvia

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22616/j.landarchart.2026.29.02

Keywords:

energy community, energy transition, common good

Abstract

The European Union regards energy communities as an important  instrument for advancing the energy transition, promoting citizen participation, and expanding renewable energy production. However, despite the legal and policy framework established by the European Union, the practical development of energy communities in Latvia remains limited. 
Although previous research has examined energy community governance  models and the legal, institutional, and social factors influencing their  development, there is still a lack of studies that define a governance model  for energy communities adapted to Latvia’s institutional, legal, and  social context, including the roles of institutional actors and spatial  planning aspects influencing their practical implementation. Therefore,  this study aims to empirically validate a conceptual model for the  development of energy communities in Latvia by identifying the key institutional actors, their roles, and the preconditions required for  generating the common good and enabling the practical implementation of energy communities.
The proposed model was developed by integrating the findings of a series  of interrelated studies addressing the legal, institutional, and social  preconditions for energy community development in order to identify the  factors essential for their implementation within the Latvian institutional  and regulatory context. To validate and refine the proposed model, a focus  group was conducted involving representatives of the principal  stakeholders in energy community development, including national public  authorities responsible for energy and spatial planning policies, municipalities and municipal representative organisations, residential  building managers, and an existing energy community. The discussion  focused on the appropriate scale of energy communities, governance  arrangements, and the roles of institutional actors, providing  recommendations for further refinement of the proposed model. The findings indicate that the development of energy communities in Latvia is  constrained by limited experience in collective action under democratic  market conditions and insufficient institutional capacity. Consequently, municipalities should participate alongside citizens as institutional  members of energy communities. The study demonstrates that  municipalities can play a crucial role in defining the common good,  providing institutional support, coordinating local energy community  initiatives, and strengthening public trust and cooperation. These findings contribute to the development of a governance framework for energy communities that is better suited to the Latvian context and may support  their successful implementation at the local level.

Author Biographies

  • Mārtiņš Auders, Riga Technical University

    PhD Candidate, Faculty of Engineering Economics and Management, Riga Technical University, Latvia.

  • Ineta Geipele, Riga Technical University

    Dr. oec., Professor, Faculty of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, Riga Technical University, Latvia.

  • Sanda Lapuķe, Riga Technical University

    Dr. oec., Associate Professor, Faculty of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, Riga Technical University, Latvia.

  • Iveta Amoliņa, Riga Technical University

    PhD, Researcher, Faculty of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, Riga Technical University, Riga, Latvia.

  • Māra Liepa-Zemeša, Riga Technical University

    Dr. arch., Director, Architecture and Design Institute, Riga Technical University, Latvia.

References

1. Ahmed, S., Ali, A. D’angola, A. A review of renewable energy communities: Concepts, scope, progress, challenges, and recommendations. Sustainability, 16(5), 2024, 1749. DOI: 10.3390/su16051749.

2. Akmentiņa, L. Participatory planning in post-socialist cities: A case study of Riga. Architecture and Urban Planning, 16(1), 2020, 17–25. DOI 10.2478/aup-2020-0004.

3. Akmentiņa, L. E-participation and engagement in urban planning: Experiences from the Baltic cities. Urban Research & Practice, 16(4), 624–657, 2023. DOI: 10.1080/17535069.2022.2068965.

4. Auders, M., Amoliņa, I., Balinskis, N., Geipele, I., Lapuķe, S., Drukis, P. Citizen motivation and collective action in the development of energy communities: A case study of Latvia. Latvian Journal of Physics and Technical Sciences, 63(1), 2026, 93–111. DOI 10.2478/lpts-2026-0008.

5. Auders, M., Lapuķe, S. Evolving concept of energy communities in the European Union. Latvian Journal of Physics and Technical Sciences, 61(3), 2024, 53–60. DOI 10.2478/lpts-2024-0020.

6. Auders, M., Ozoliņa, J., Liepa-Zemeša, M., Bitterman, A. Conflicts in striving a common good: The implementation of wind energy in Latvia and the potential of energy communities. Manuscript submitted for publication.

7. Barabino, E., Fioriti, D., Guerrazzi, E., Mariuzzo, I., Poli, D., Raugi, M., Razaei, E., Schito, E., Thomopulos, D. Energy Communities: A review on trends, energy system modelling, business models, and optimisation objectives. Sustainable Energy, Grids and Networks, 36, 2023, 101187. DOI 10.1016/j.segan.2023.101187.

8. Bohle, D. Neoliberal hegemony, transnational capital and the terms of the EU’s eastward expansion. Capital & Class, 30(1), 2006, 57–86. DOI 10.1177/030981680608800104.

9. Bokolo, A., J. The role of community engagement in urban innovation towards the co-creation of smart sustainable cities. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 15(1), 2024, 1592–1624. DOI 10.1007/s13132-023-01176-1.

10. Bokolo, A., J. Citizen participation and engagement in local energy communities: Governing sustainable energy transitions through human-centric approaches. Energies, 19(4), 2026, 917. DOI 10.3390/en19040917.

11. Bonfert, B. ‘We like sharing energy but currently there’s no advantage’: Transformative opportunities and challenges of local energy communities in Europe. Energy Research & Social Science, 107, 2024, 103351. DOI 10.1016/j.erss.2023.103351.

12. Boostani, P., Pellegrini-Masini, G., Klein, J. The role of community energy schemes in reducing energy poverty and promoting social inclusion: A systematic literature review. Energies, 17(13), 2024, 3232. DOI 10.3390/en17133232.

13. Broska, L. H., Vögele, S., Shamon, H., Wittenberg, I. On the future(s) of energy communities in the German energy transition: A derivation of transformation pathways. Sustainability, 14(6), 2022, 3169. DOI 10.3390/su14063169.

14. Busengdal, E., Amdam, R. Co-creation as a strategy for expanding networks and creating a broader collaboration profile for implementing integration policies. Cogent Social Sciences, 9(1), 2023, 2241259. DOI 10.1080/23311886.2023.2241259.

15. Cabinet of Ministers of the Republic of Latvia. 1994. Regulations No. 194 on Spatial Planning. Republic of Latvia. [Viewed 1 September 2026]. Available from: https://www.vestnesis.lv/ta/id/57584-teritorialplanosanas-noteikumi

16. Cabinet of Ministers of the Republic of Latvia. 2024. Regulation No. 808 of 10 December 2024, Regulations for the Registration and Operation of Energy Communities. [Viewed 1 September 2026]. Available from: https://likumi.lv/ta/id/357125-energokopienu-registresanas-un-darbibas-noteikumi

17. Coy, D., Malekpour, S., Saeri, A. K., Dargaville, R. Rethinking community empowerment in the energy transformation: A critical review of the definitions, drivers and outcomes. Energy Research & Social Science, 72, 2021, 101871. DOI 10.1016/j.erss.2020.101871.

18. De Almeida, L., Cappelli, V., Klausmann, N., Van Soest, H. Peer-to-peer trading and energy community in the electricity market: Analysing the literature on law and regulation and looking ahead to future challenges. RSCAS Working Paper, No. 2021/35, 2021. Florence: Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies, European University Institute. DOI 10.2139/ssrn.3821689.

19. De Simone, E., Rochira, A., Mannarini, T. Individual and community catalysts for renewable energy communities (RECs) development. Current Opinion in Psychology, 62, 2025, 101987. DOI 10.1016/j.copsyc.2024.101987.

20. Djinlev, V., Brenner-Fliesser, M., Pearce, B. J. Beyond energy communities: Comparing citizen engagement, barriers, and behavioral change across collective energy initiatives. Energy Research & Social Science, 135, 2026, 104682. DOI 10.1016/j.erss.2026.104682.

21. Dóci, G. Collective action with altruists: How are citizens led renewable energy communities developed? Sustainability, 13(2), 2021, 507. DOI 10.3390/su13020507.

22. European Commission. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: REPowerEU Plan. COM(2022) 230 final. Brussels: European Commission, 2022. Available from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52022DC0230

23. European Commission. European Citizens’ Energy Efficiency Panel: 9th and 10th recommendation [online]. European Commission’s Citizens’ Engagement Platform, 2024 [Viewed 1 September 2026]. Available from: https://citizens.ec.europa.eu/european-citizens-panels/energy-efficiency-panel_en

24. European Commission. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. COM SWD(2025) 140 final, 2026 [Seen 10 March 2026]. Available from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52025DC0274

25. European Commission. Citizens Energy Package [online]. [Seen 16 August 2026]. Available from: https://energy.ec.europa.eu/topics/markets-and-consumers/energy-consumers-andprosumers/citizens-energy-package_en

26. European Commission. EU climate, energy and environmental targets [online]. [Viewed 1 September 2026]. Available from: https://commission.europa.eu/topics/climate-action/euclimate-energy-and-environmental-targets_en

27. European Parliament and Council of the European Union. Directive (EU) 2019/944 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 June 2019 on common rules for the internal market for electricity and amending Directive 2012/27/EU (recast), 2019. Available from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2019/944/oj

28. European Parliament and Council of the European Union. Directive (EU) 2023/1791 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 September 2023 on energy efficiency and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 (recast) [online]. Official Journal of the European Union, L 231, 20 September 2023, 1–111. [Viewed 1 September 2026]. Available from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2023/1791/oj

29. Geipele, S., Kundziņa, A., Pudzis, E., Lazdiņš, A. Evaluation of community involvement in participatory process: Lessons learned in the Baltic Sea region. Architecture and Urban Planning, 16(1), 2020, 56–65. DOI 10.2478/aup-2020-0009.

30. Gjorgievski, V., Z., Cundeva, S., Georghiou, G., E. Social arrangements, technical designs and impacts of energy communities: A review. Renewable Energy, 169, 2021, 1138–1156. DOI 10.1016/j.renene.2021.01.078.

31. Jacobs, C. The challenge of public sector reform in EC accession countries: Reflections from the Baltics, especially Latvia. Public Administration and Development, 24, 2004, 321–331. DOI 10.1002/pad.312.

32. Kalkbrenner, B., J., Roosen, J. Citizens’ willingness to participate in local renewable energy projects: The role of community and trust in Germany. energy research & social science, 13, 2016, 60–70. DOI 10.1016/j.erss.2015.12.006.

33. Krug, M., Radtke, J., Lowitzsch, J., Mey, F. On the future(s) of energy communities in the German energy transition: A derivation of transformation pathways. Sustainability, 14(6), 2022, 3569. DOI 10.3390/su14063569.

34. Kundziņa, A., Geipele, I., Lapuķe, S., Auders, M. Energy Performance Aspects of Non-Residential Buildings in Latvia. Latvian Journal of Physics and Technical Sciences, 59(6), 2022, 30–42. DOI 10.2478/lpts-2022-0045.

35. Kundziņa, A., Geipele, I., Auders, M., Lapuķe, S. Energy Performance Aspects of Residential Buildings in Latvia. Latvian Journal of Physics and Technical Sciences, 60(1), 2023, 39–51. DOI 10.2478/lpts-2023-0004.

36. Kupiec, B., Potrzebowska, J., Kaçiu, E. Energy communities and the legacy of post-socialism [online]. Warsaw: Heinrich Böll Stiftung; CoopTech Hub, 2024. ISBN 978-83-966347-8-8. [Viewed 1 September 2026]. Available from: https://cz.boell.org/sites/default/files/importedFiles/2025/01/21/energy_communities_legacy-of-postsocialism.pdf

37. Lazaroiu, A., C., Roscia, M., Lăzăroiu, G., C., Siano, P. Review of energy communities: Definitions, regulations, topologies, and technologies. Smart Cities, 8(1), 2025, 8. DOI 10.3390/smartcities8010008.

38. Lennon, B., Dunphy, N. Sustaining energetic communities: Energy citizenship and participation in an age of upheaval and transition. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 2024, 3267. DOI 10.1038/s41598-024-53367-8.

39. Liepa-Zemeša, M., Auders, M., Treija, S. Arguments for the common good in planning: Comprehensive analysis of planning documents in Latvia. Architecture and Urban Planning, 21(1), 2025, 177–190. DOI 10.2478/aup-2025-0014.

40. Liepa-Zemeša, M., Hess, D., B. Effects of public perception on urban planning: Evolution of an inclusive planning system during crises in Latvia. Town Planning Review, 87(1), 2016, 71–92. DOI 10.3828/tpr.2016.5.

41. Ministry of Economics of the Republic of Latvia. Ēku atjaunošanas ilgtermiņa stratēģija [online]. Riga: Ministry of Economics, 2020 [Viewed 1 September 2026]. Available from: https://likumi.lv/ta/id/342294-eku-atjaunosanas-ilgtermina-strategija

42. Ministry of Economics of the Republic of Latvia. Data on the number of multi-apartment residential buildings not taken over into the management of apartment owners. Unpublished data provided by the Ministry of Economics of the Republic of Latvia, 13 May 2025.

43. Pierre, G., Mazaud, C. Community acceptance of wind energy: Lessons from a case study on a local participatory project in Pays des Mauges (West France). European Countryside, 13(4), 2021, 715–733. DOI 10.2478/euco-2021-0038.

44. Saeima of the Republic of Latvia. Spatial Development Planning Law. Riga: Latvijas Vēstnesis, 2002.

45. Saeima of the Republic of Latvia. Elektroenerģijas tirgus likums [online]. Latvijas Vēstnesis, 11 May 2005, No. 74. [Viewed 1 September 2026]. Available from: https://likumi.lv/ta/id/108834-elektroenergijastirgus-likums

46. Saeima of the Republic of Latvia. Dzīvokļa īpašuma likums [online]. Latvijas Vēstnesis, 17 November 2010, No. 183. [Viewed 1 September 2026]. Available from: https://likumi.lv/ta/id/221382-dzivoklaipasuma-likums

47. Saeima of the Republic of Latvia. Teritorijas attīstības plānošanas likums [online]. Latvijas Vēstnesis, 2011 [Viewed 1 September 2026]. Available from: https://likumi.lv/ta/id/238807-teritorijas-attistibas-planosanas-likums

48. Seimuškāne, L.. Iedzīvotāju līdzdalība lēmumu pieņemšanas procesā pašvaldībās Latvijā un to ietekmējošo faktoru izvērtējums [online]. Doctoral dissertation. Riga: University of Latvia, 2015 [Viewed 1 September 2026]. Available from: https://dspace.lu.lv/handle/7/31338

49. Seimuškāne, L., Sloka, B., Vilka, I. Evaluation of citizens participation in local governments of Latvia. European Integration Studies, (8), 2014, 163–172. DOI 10.5755/j01.eis.0.8.6942.

50. Stephens, J., C. Energy democracy: Redistributing power to the people through renewable transformation. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 61(2), 2019, 4–13. DOI 10.1080/00139157.2019.1564212.

51. Treija, S., Bratuškins, U., Koroļova, A. University–community engagement: Formation of new collaboration patterns in participatory budgeting process. Architecture and Urban Planning, 18(1), 2022, 156–165. DOI 10.2478/aup-2022-0016.

52. Van Gestel, N., Kuiper, M., Pegan, A. Strategies and transitions to public sector co-creation across Europe. Public Policy and Administration [online]. First published online 26 June 2023. DOI 10.1177/09520767231184523.

53. Van Veelen, B. Negotiating energy democracy in practice: Governance processes in community energy projects. Environmental Politics, 27(4), 2018, 644–665. DOI 10.1080/09644016.2018.1427824.

54. Vernay, A., L., Sebi, C. Energy communities and their ecosystems: A comparison of France and the Netherlands. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 158, 2020, 120123. DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120123.

55. Wahlund, M., Palm, J. The role of energy democracy and energy citizenship for participatory energy transitions: A comprehensive review. Energy Research & Social Science, 87, 2022, 102482. DOI 10.1016/j.erss.2021.102482.

56. Wüstenhagen, R., Wolsink, M. , Bürer, M. J. Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: An introduction to the concept. Energy Policy, 35(5), 2007, 2683–2691. DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.001.

57. Zelli, F. The provision of conflicting public goods: Incompatibilities among trade regimes and environmental regimes [online]. Tübinger Arbeitspapiere zur Internationalen Politik und Friedensforschung, No. 49. Tübingen: Universität Tübingen, Center for International Relations, 2007. ISBN 3-927604-46-1. [Viewed 1 September 2026].

Downloads

Published

30-10-2026

How to Cite

Energy community development model for multi-apartment residential buildings in Latvia. (2026). Landscape Architecture and Art, 29(29), 19-27. https://doi.org/10.22616/j.landarchart.2026.29.02